TRAIN WRECK 2

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

It's all George's Fault


We hear it over and over again. It's George Bush's fault. It doesn't matter what it is. The recent rail crash in L.A. Bush's fault. Al Queda hates America. Bush's Fault. Outrageous Gas Prices. Definitely Bush's Fault. The current Financial Crisis. Well... Let's hear this one from the Speaker of the house, Nancy Pelosi.

"Madam Speaker, when was the last time someone asked you for $700 billion? It is a number that is staggering, but tells us only the costs of the Bush Administration's failed economic policies -- policies built on budgetary recklessness, on an anything goes mentality, with no regulation, no supervision, and no discipline in the system. Democrats believe in the free market, which can and does create jobs, wealth, and capital, but left to its own devices it has created chaos.

That chaos is the dismal picture painted by Treasury Secretary Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke a week and a half ago in the Capitol. As they pointed out, we confront a crisis of historic magnitude that has the ability to do serious injury not simply to our economy, but to the American people: not just to Wall Street, but to everyday Americans on Main Street. It is our responsibility today, to help avert that catastrophic outcome. Let us be clear: This is a crisis caused on Wall Street. But it is a crisis that reaches to Main Street in every city and town of the United States."

Either Nancy Pelosi is an Idiot, or she believes you are an idiot. It might be both, I'm not sure, but here are the facts. The Bush Administration from almost the very beginning has been warning of this crisis.


Bush Called For Reform of Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac 17 Times in 2008 Alone... Dems Ignored Warnings

For many years the President and his Administration have not only warned of the systemic consequences of financial turmoil at a housing government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) but also put forward thoughtful plans to reduce the risk that either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac would encounter such difficulties. President Bush publicly called for GSE reform 17 times in 2008 alone before Congress acted.

Unfortunately, these warnings went unheeded, as the President's repeated attempts to reform the supervision of these entities were thwarted by the legislative maneuvering of those who emphatically denied there were problems.

The White House released this list of attempts by President Bush to reform Freddie Mae and Freddie Mac since he took office in 2001.
Unfortunately, Congress did not act on the president's warnings:

2001

April: The Administration's FY02 budget declares that the size of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is "a potential problem," because "financial trouble of a large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets, affecting Federally insured entities and economic activity."

2002

May: The President calls for the disclosure and corporate governance principles contained in his 10-point plan for corporate responsibility to apply to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (OMB Prompt Letter to OFHEO, 5/29/02)

2003

January: Freddie Mac announces it has to restate financial results for the previous three years.

February: The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) releases a report explaining that "although investors perceive an implicit Federal guarantee of [GSE] obligations," "the government has provided no explicit legal backing for them." As a consequence, unexpected problems at a GSE could immediately spread into financial sectors beyond the housing market. ("Systemic Risk: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Role of OFHEO," OFHEO Report, 2/4/03)

September: Fannie Mae discloses SEC investigation and acknowledges OFHEO's review found earnings manipulations.

September: Treasury Secretary John Snow testifies before the House Financial Services Committee to recommend that Congress enact "legislation to create a new Federal agency to regulate and supervise the financial activities of our housing-related government sponsored enterprises" and set prudent and appropriate minimum capital adequacy requirements.

October: Fannie Mae discloses $1.2 billion accounting error.

November: Council of the Economic Advisers (CEA) Chairman Greg Mankiw explains that any "legislation to reform GSE regulation should empower the new regulator with sufficient strength and credibility to reduce systemic risk." To reduce the potential for systemic instability, the regulator would have "broad authority to set both risk-based and minimum capital standards" and "receivership powers necessary to wind down the affairs of a troubled GSE." (N. Gregory Mankiw, Remarks At The Conference Of State Bank Supervisors State Banking Summit And Leadership, 11/6/03)

2004

February: The President's FY05 Budget again highlights the risk posed by the explosive growth of the GSEs and their low levels of required capital, and called for creation of a new, world-class regulator: "The Administration has determined that the safety and soundness regulators of the housing GSEs lack sufficient power and stature to meet their responsibilities, and therefore…should be replaced with a new strengthened regulator." (2005 Budget Analytic Perspectives, pg. 83)

February: CEA Chairman Mankiw cautions Congress to "not take [the financial market's] strength for granted." Again, the call from the Administration was to reduce this risk by "ensuring that the housing GSEs are overseen by an effective regulator." (N. Gregory Mankiw, Op-Ed, "Keeping Fannie And Freddie's House In Order," Financial Times, 2/24/04)

June: Deputy Secretary of Treasury Samuel Bodman spotlights the risk posed by the GSEs and called for reform, saying "We do not have a world-class system of supervision of the housing government sponsored enterprises (GSEs), even though the importance of the housing financial system that the GSEs serve demands the best in supervision to ensure the long-term vitality of that system. Therefore, the Administration has called for a new, first class, regulatory supervisor for the three housing GSEs: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banking System." (Samuel Bodman, House Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Testimony, 6/16/04)

2005

April: Treasury Secretary John Snow repeats his call for GSE reform, saying "Events that have transpired since I testified before this Committee in 2003 reinforce concerns over the systemic risks posed by the GSEs and further highlight the need for real GSE reform to ensure that our housing finance system remains a strong and vibrant source of funding for expanding homeownership opportunities in America… Half-measures will only exacerbate the risks to our financial system." (Secretary John W. Snow, "Testimony Before The U.S. House Financial Services Committee," 4/13/05)

2007

July: Two Bear Stearns hedge funds invested in mortgage securities collapse.

August: President Bush emphatically calls on Congress to pass a reform package for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, saying "first things first when it comes to those two institutions. Congress needs to get them reformed, get them streamlined, get them focused, and then I will consider other options." (President George W. Bush, Press Conference, The White House, 8/9/07)

September: RealtyTrac announces foreclosure filings up 243,000 in August – up 115 percent from the year before.

September: Single-family existing home sales decreases 7.5 percent from the previous month – the lowest level in nine years. Median sale price of existing homes fell six percent from the year before.

December: President Bush again warns Congress of the need to pass legislation reforming GSEs, saying "These institutions provide liquidity in the mortgage market that benefits millions of homeowners, and it is vital they operate safely and operate soundly. So I've called on Congress to pass legislation that strengthens independent regulation of the GSEs – and ensures they focus on their important housing mission. The GSE reform bill passed by the House earlier this year is a good start. But the Senate has not acted. And the United States Senate needs to pass this legislation soon." (President George W. Bush, Discusses Housing, The White House, 12/6/07)

2008

January: Bank of America announces it will buy Countrywide.

January: Citigroup announces mortgage portfolio lost $18.1 billion in value.

February: Assistant Secretary David Nason reiterates the urgency of reforms, says "A new regulatory structure for the housing GSEs is essential if these entities are to continue to perform their public mission successfully." (David Nason, Testimony On Reforming GSE Regulation, Senate Committee On Banking, Housing And Urban Affairs, 2/7/08)

March: Bear Stearns announces it will sell itself to JPMorgan Chase.

March: President Bush calls on Congress to take action and "move forward with reforms on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They need to continue to modernize the FHA, as well as allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to homeowners to refinance their mortgages." (President George W. Bush, Remarks To The Economic Club Of New York, New York, NY, 3/14/08)

April: President Bush urges Congress to pass the much needed legislation and "modernize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. [There are] constructive things Congress can do that will encourage the housing market to correct quickly by … helping people stay in their homes." (President George W. Bush, Meeting With Cabinet, the White House, 4/14/08)

May: President Bush issues several pleas to Congress to pass legislation reforming Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac before the situation deteriorates further.

"Americans are concerned about making their mortgage payments and keeping their homes. Yet Congress has failed to pass legislation I have repeatedly requested to modernize the Federal Housing Administration that will help more families stay in their homes, reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to ensure they focus on their housing mission, and allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to refinance sub-prime loans." (President George W. Bush, Radio Address, 5/3/08)

"[T]he government ought to be helping creditworthy people stay in their homes. And one way we can do that – and Congress is making progress on this – is the reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That reform will come with a strong, independent regulator." (President George W. Bush, Meeting With The Secretary Of The Treasury, the White House, 5/19/08)

"Congress needs to pass legislation to modernize the Federal Housing Administration, reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to ensure they focus on their housing mission, and allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to refinance subprime loans." (President George W. Bush, Radio Address, 5/31/08)

June: As foreclosure rates continued to rise in the first quarter, the President once again asks Congress to take the necessary measures to address this challenge, saying "we need to pass legislation to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac." (President George W. Bush, Remarks At Swearing In Ceremony For Secretary Of Housing And Urban Development, Washington, D.C., 6/6/08)

July: Congress heeds the President's call for action and passes reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as it becomes clear that the institutions are failing.
In 2005-- Senator John McCain partnered with three other Senate Republicans to reform the government’s involvement in lending.
Democrats blocked this reform, too.

More... Not only did democrats not act on these warnings but Barack Obama put one of the major Sub-Prime Slime players on his campaign as finance chairperson.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now Barney Frank (D- Massachusetts), Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, blame the House Republicans for NOT passing the $700 Billion bailout plan. EVEN THOUGH 40% OF HOUSE DEMOCRATS VOTED "NO" ON IT. The Democratically led House of Representatives did not NEED a single Republican vote to pass this bill. Now that's what I call "Real Leadership". It's also interesting to note that Barney Frank was the lead opposition in 2003 to the Presidents Plan to reform Freddie and Fannie.

"In 2003, Frank opposed Bush administration and Congressional Republican efforts for the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis. [28] Under the plan a new agency would have been created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that were the two largest players in the mortgage lending industry. "These two entities, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are not facing any kind of financial crisis," Frank said. He added, "The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing."[29]" - Wikipedia

How did your Representative Vote? Find out at http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iE1r_DuYH2j4rBy8JqBaVQ40MiOQD93GJ5H04 Mine vote "AYE" and I've already contacted him to express my EXTREME disappointment. You see, most americans are against this bailout. Reports of phone calls to representatives offices are as little as 300:1 against and as high as 1000:1 against. I applaud those representative who actually LISTENED to their constituents. As for my representative? I expect a very good answer or I'm going to exact a "Donald Trump"..... "YOUR FIRED"....

Is this the Black Horse of the apocolypse? I don't think so, unless I missed the White and Red Horses....

Jeff

Thursday, September 18, 2008

FIRE, Ready, Aim




We're in pretty big trouble in my opinion... If I didn't have faith that all this is somehow in God's Grand Plan, I believe I'd be really worried. John McCain once again reminded me why I really wanted Mitt to win the nomination. First, he backtracked on his statement that the US had strong fundamentals. Then he blamed the current crisis on the SEC Chairman Christopher Cox. I know Chris Cox, he was my Congressman for many years and even had an office away from the office in Engineering firm I worked at many years ago. First mistake... John McCain said he would've fired Cox if he were president. The SEC Chairman, as I understand it, is appointed by the president and is confirmed by the Senate, much like a Supreme Court Justice, but this is for a term of 5 years. There are 5 commissioners on the SEC, each serving a 5 year term and no more than 3 can be of the same party. I don't believe a president CAN fire the SEC Chairman.... (duhhhh #1) Second mistake. It's not the SEC's Fault... The SEC is a regulatory agency, sorta like the FBI of the Stock Market. Does the FBI catch every single criminal? Stating that banks failing on the heels of the huge mortgage debacle is like saying it's George Bush's fault that a bunch of Psycho's flew jumbo jets into the World Trade Center. Uhhhh... wait... the left IS that delusional... but NOT OUR nominee for president. John McCain KNOWs where the fault lies, but he's too afraid to upset the "reach across the ailes" apple cart. He knew very clearly that this was coming. He stated it very plainly in 2005 when he co-sponsered a bill to reform Freddy-Mac and Fannie-Mae. A bill that was torpedoed by the Democrats.

"I join as a cosponsor of the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190, to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole." - John McCain 2005.

GSE stands for Government Sponsored Enterprise and as I understand it Freddy and Fanny had a market advantage by borrowing money from the government at a lower rate than everyone else so they could loan it out to lower income folks to buy houses. The problem is that these loans are also risky AND the Dems, especially our illustrious San Fran Nan (Nancy Pelosi) kept raising the limit on what Freddy and Fanny could loan, which means they were putting up more and more competition pressure on everyone else... What did everyone else do? They went riskier. AND they were also under pressure NOT to discriminate. Instead of focusing on managing risks, it seems, they were trying to play the game to compete with OUR GOVERNMENT and NOT paying attention to the bonehead who had no business buying a house. No Down, Zero Interest baloons are a ticking time bomb and everyone in the business knew it. Of course even sharks bite themselves in the middle of a feeding frenzy. But let's follow the money and see where some of these fingers SHOULD be pointing... Oh, by the way, these "Government Sponsored Enterprises" can make political contributions... how stoooopid is that? I never took an Ethics Class, but this sounds like a really, really good example of a conflict of interest.

Follow the Money:

Since 1989, the top 20 list of Congress (house and senate) that Freddie and Fannie contributed to, include some interesting names. Barrack Obama came in 2nd, even though he's only been in Congress a few years, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and John Kerry. Very interesting. WHY DOESN'T MCCAIN MENTION THIS????? Of course, when asked, Nancy Pelosi said democrats had absolutely no responsibility for any of this and pointed the finger at the President. If I added up all the things that President Bush is responsible for, I'd think he had power comparable to Superman.

So anyway... I'm reminded of a Bug's Bunny cartoon. I can't remember what the context was or what the punchline was, but at the end of the cartoon, we see Bugs in an army helmet standing on an assembly line with artillery shells filing by. He had a large mallet and he would shut his eyes and bang the end of the artillery shell with the mallet. When it didn't explode, he would write "Dud" on it. That will be the feeling I will have when I check off "McCain/Palin" on my ballot in a few short weeks. I really like the VP, but the real vote will be for a man that, although he holds all the right positions on the issues I really care about, he is often WAY too eager to compromise on other really important things... things that affect me and my family... I worry about the compromises he will make as president with those on the other side of the ocean.

The scene on election day, for me, will be one of gritting teeth and muttering under my breath, over and over....

"An imperfect republican is better than a perfect socialist"

Jeff

UPDATE: Franklin Raines, former Clinton administration budget director; James Johnson, former aide to Democratic Vice President Walter Mondale; and Jamie Gorelick, former Clinton administration deputy attorney general have all served as Executives for Fannie Mae. Johnson earned $21 million in just his last year serving as Fannie Mae CEO from 1991 to 1998; Raines earned $90 million in his five years as Fannie Mae CEO, from 1999 to 2004; and Gorelick earned an estimated $26 million serving as vice chair of Fannie Mae from 1998 to 2003.

Remember the "Gorelick wall"? google it... it's one of the reasons, I believe, we didn't have a clue that terrorists were about to strike on 9/11.

Currently Raines currently advises Obama on housing policy.

Johnson was appointed to head Obama's vice presidential selection committee, until a controversy concerning an alleged $7 millions in questionable real estate loans he received on favorable terms from failed sub-prime mortgage lender Countrywide Financial surfaced and forced him to step down.

A panel chaired by Elena Kagan, dean and professor of law at Harvard Law School, speculated at the June two-day meeting of the American Constitution Society that Gorelick was a possible attorney general cabinet appointment if Obama should be elected president.


see the details here: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=75586